Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
Bibliographic Information
International Title: |
Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing |
p-ISSN: |
1550-8307 Period: [2005 .. ] |
e-ISSN: |
1878-7541 Period: [2005 .. ] |
Language: |
English |
Country of publication: |
United States |
URL: |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1[..] |
Publishing House: |
Elsevier |
ITAR Code: |
1006494 |
NPI Scientific Field: |
Public, Environmental and Occupational Health |
Minimum Criteria
✅ Scientific editorial board |
✅ Peer reviewed |
✅ International authorship |
✅ Confirmed ISSN |
Open Access
Chr. Michelsens Institutt
Departementenes Sikkerhets- og Serviceorganisasjon
Direktoratet for strålevern og atomsikkerhet
Folkehelseinstituttet
Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt
GRID-Arendal
Handelshøyskolen BI
Havforskningsinstituttet
Helse Bergen HF - Haukeland universitetssykehus
Høgskolen i Innlandet
Høgskolen i Molde - Vitenskapelig høgskole i logistikk
Høgskolen i Østfold
Høgskulen i Volda
Høgskulen på Vestlandet
Høyskolen Kristiania
Institutt for Energiteknikk
Kreftregisteret - Institutt for populasjonsbasert kreftforskning
Lovisenberg diakonale høgskole
Meteorologisk institutt
Miljødirektoratet
Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress
NILU - Stiftelsen Norsk Institutt For Luftforskning
Nofima
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Nord Universitet
Norges geologiske undersøkelse
Norges Geotekniske Institutt
Norges Handelshøyskole
Norges Idrettshøgskole
Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet
Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat
Norsk institutt for bioøkonomi
Norsk institutt for naturforskning
Norsk institutt for vannforskning
Norsk Polarinstitutt
NUBU - Nasjonalt utviklingssenter for barn og unge
Oslo universitetssykehus HF
OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet
RBUP Øst og Sør
RURALIS – Institutt for rural- og regionalforskning
SINTEF AS
SINTEF Energi AS
SINTEF Manufacturing
SINTEF Narvik
SINTEF Ocean
St. Olavs Hospital HF
Statens arbeidsmiljøinstitutt
Statistisk sentralbyrå
Tannhelsetjenestens kompetansesentre
Transportøkonomisk institutt
UiT - Norges arktiske universitet
Universitetet i Agder
Universitetet i Bergen
Universitetet i Oslo
Universitetet i Stavanger
Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
Universitetssenteret på Svalbard
Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge HF
Veterinærinstituttet
VID vitenskapelige høgskole
Scientific level placements and Norwegian HEIs publication points
Level X decision: The National Board of Scholarly Publishing have received concerns about the scientific quality of the journal. In accordance with the Publication Committe for Medicine, we have decided to give the journal level X so we can receive feedback on the journal from the scientific community.
Year | Scientific Level | Author Shares | Publication Points |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | X |
|
|
2022 | 1 |
|
|
2021 | 1 | 0.1429 | 0.4914 |
2020 | 1 | 0.9583 | 1.7681 |
2019 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2018 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.7746 |
2017 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2016 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2015 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2014 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2013 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2012 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
2011 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
2010 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2009 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Comments
Comments regarding updates on the publication channel are only visible for you and the advisors. Comments regarding the scientific quality and levels will be public.
Login to commentI would like to inform the committee that the perspective by one or a few researchers in favor or against a journal must not be considered final for making a decision on the inclusion or exclusion of a journal from the list of journals having a nivå.
I have the experience of reviewing for this journal and have seen that the journal does not discriminate between articles with positive or negative results on the effects of an intervention. At least they enter equally to the review process, but what has made the rejection of studies with a nonsignificant result has been mainly weaknesses in the methods section or the whole quality of presentation.
The presence of many studies with positive results of an intervention on an outcome published by this journal can not be considered a bias by the ‘’editorial team’’. Rather it could be the submission of many studies to this journal with such a relationship between the intervention and outcome.
Finally, interests of publishing studies reporting a positive effect of an intervention is a problem affecting all journals nationally and internationally. The following is an example of journal of lancet, as the best journal in health science:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014067369190201Y
Sincerely,
Thank you for your comment.
We decided to put the journal at level X in accordance with the recommendation from the scientific panel. We will reconsider it at the next decision meeting, based on feedback and other available information about the journal, your feedback included.
Kind regards,
Lena-Cecilie Linge
The articles contained in the latest edition (Vol 18, Iss 5) discuss variously: Reiki (reporting positive results), electric cars (not sure how this relates to either spirituality or healing), alien abductions (I am not kidding), aromatherapy (reporting positive results), acupuncture (reporting positive results), telepathy (reporting positive results - again I am not making this up), acupressure (reporting positive results), Ayurvedic "medicine" (something about chakras, again reporting a positive result), thought field therapy (more psychic powers - again, reporting a positive effect), herbal medicine (again, a positive result)... need I go on? This is just a single issue and this journal has been pumping out this nonsense for decades.
The journal even has a "Cochrane Corner" where they "respond" to Cochrane Collaboration systematic reviews, presumably any that they disagree with.
It is utterly outrageous that this journal is STILL listed as Nivå 1 despite an obvious pro-alternative medicine bias in the editorial board and its lobbying against evidence-based medicine. What is equally outrageous is that this journal is also – bizarrely – indexed in Web of Science. I can only assume that once you are indexed in WOS you have to shoot somebody in the street in order to have that status removed.
It is published by Elsevier - a supposedly "reputable" publisher - but they should frankly be taken to task for enabling this journal for so long.
Researchers at Norwegian institutions published in this journal in the years 2011, 2012, 2018, 2020, and 2021. I imagine that they will continue to do so until it is downgraded.
We have decided to put the journal at level X, in accordance with the recommendation from the scientific panel. We will reconsider it at the next decision meeting, based on feedbacks and available information.
Kind regards,
Lena-Cecilie Linge
Kind regards,
Lena-Cecilie Linge
We will go through the journal again.
We reconsidered the journal in 2019 and could not find reasons for taking it down to 0.
Kind regards,
Lena-Cecilie Linge