Expired: Seminar for reporting of scientific publications in NVA (in Norwegian)

Expired: Seminar on research language and the transition to open access for Norwegian journals

Expired: The Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills is talkning at this years Munin Conference

Expired: The Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills is talkning at this years Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Politics

We are experiencing problems retrieving information from DOAJ. As a result, we are currently unable to automatically update the Norwegian Register with data from DOAJ. The search may therefore display incorrect information regarding DOAJ status. We are working to resolve the issue.

Incorrect information about DOAJ status

Vi har problemer med å hente ut informasjon fra DOAJ. Inntil videre får vi derfor ikke automatisk oppdatert Kanalregisteret med informasjon fra DOAJ. Søket kan derfor vise feil informasjon når det gjelder DOAJ-status. Vi jobber med å løse saken. 

Feil med informasjon fra DOAJ

Search in the Norwegian Register

Download current list

Search

How to suggest for level 1

How to suggest for level 2

Submission form for level 1

How to suggest

Before you suggest a publication channel

Criteria for level 1

Guide to applying

Levels and changes in level

Publication channels under discussion (level X)

Send in messages of concern?

Levels

Apply

Open Access in the Norwegian Register

Agreements on open publishing

Register institutional agreements

Open Access Agreements

Plan  S

Open Access

Statistics

Decision meetings

Events

Current

The Norwegian Register in the future

Activities

About the Norwegian Register

The Norwegian Register and the funding of research

About us

Privacy Policy

Cookies

The Norwegian Register

Scientific fields and scientific panels

The National Board of Scholarly Publishing

Cooperation and data providers

Cooperation

ISSN and ISBN

The National Board of Scholarly Publishing (NPU)

The Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers

Publishing Agreements

Scientific publication and levels

Sikt

Brief about

About

Publication channels in the Norwegian Register

Find journals and publishers

Assessed publication channels

Suggest publication channel

Find the decisions about levels on publication channels that scholars and academic staff has suggested for inclusion at level 1 or level 2. 

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers 

In the meetings of The National Board of Scholarly Publishing, issues related to scientific publishing are discussed. 

The National Board of Scholarly Publishing is an advisory committee that aims to ensure that academic considerations related to scientific publishing are well taken into account in research policy. The committee includes representatives from the higher education sector, the institute sector and the health authorities.

See more information about The National Board of Scholarly Publishing at 

Meeting of The National Board of Scholarly Publishing 12. June 2026

On the decision meeting 28. May, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. Next decision meeting for level 1 is 9. October.

For the decision meeting, the Directorate has assessed

259 publication channels (publication channels that are removed from DOAJ and downgraded in Finland are not included).

12 successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled).

Together 271 publication channels in so far this year.

Of the 271 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 30 publication channels will specifically be discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing:

10 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

11 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

6 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels).

2 publication channels under discussion (level X).

1 suggestions from South African scholars (due to an agreement entered into with South Africa, we process and assess suggestions from South African scholars. At the request of the AU, these suggestions are a fixed item at the decison meetings).

See the publication channels that we assessed at the decision meeting

Decision meeting 28. May 2026

On the decision meeting 22. January, we will assess suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We will also reconsider some publication channels that already has been approved as scientific publication channels. Next decision meeting for level 1 is dato.

Decision meeting 22. January 2027

In the meetings of The National Board of Scholarly Publishing, issues related to scientific publishing are discussed.

The National Board of Scholarly Publishing is an advisory committee that aims to ensure that academic considerations related to scientific publishing are well taken into account in research policy. The committee includes representatives from the higher education sector, the institute sector and the health authorities.

See more information about The National Board of Scholarly Publishing at https://npi.hkdir.no.

Meeting of The National Board of Scholarly Publishing 27. February 2026

On the decision meeting dato, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. Next decision meeting for level 1 is 28. May.

For the decision meeting 23.01.26 , the Directorate has assessed

17 successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled).

Together 1067 publication channels for 2025.  

Of the 411 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 73 publication channels will specifically be discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing: 

2 complaints (complaints about previous decisions on level).

3 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

39 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

10 new submissions about journals that previously have been downgraded to 0 - not approved.  

8 publication channels under discussion (level X). 

3 Norwegian publication channels (suggestions about Norwegian publicationc channels, which at the request of the AU are a fixed point at the decision meetings).

Decision meeting 23. January 2026

On the decision meeting 17. October, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. Next decision meeting for level 1 is 23. January 2026. 

6 successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled).

Together 637 publication channels so far in 2025.  

Of the 278 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 42 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing: 

7 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

19 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

6 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels). 

6 publication channels under discussion (level X). 

2 Norwegian publication channels (suggestions about Norwegian publicationc channels, which at the request of the AU are a fixed point at the decision meetings).

Decision meeting 17. October 2025

On the decision meeting 05.06.25, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. Next decision meeting for level 1 will be 17. October. 

Of the 355 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 54 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing: 

1 complaints (complaints about previous decisions on level).

16 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

12 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

9 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels). 

11 publication channels under discussion (level X). 

3 suggestions from South African scholars (due to an agreement entered into with South Africa, we process and assess suggestions from South African scholars. At the request of the AU, these suggestions are a fixed item at the decison meetings).

Decision meeting 5.June 2025

On the decision meeting 24.01.25, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already has been approved as scientific publication channels.

477 publication channels (publication channels that are removed from DOAJ and downgraded in Finland are not included).

23 successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled.

Together 1253 publication channels in 2024.

Of the 500 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 53 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing: 

20 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

7 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

10 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels). 

Decision meeting 24.January 2025

On the decision meeting 18.October, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels.

41 successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled.)

Of the 378 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 60 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing:

14 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

8 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

3 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels).

33 publication channels under discussion (level X).

Decision meeting 18.October 2024

On the decision meeting 14.August, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. 

Three successors (journals that «inherit» its level from its predecessor in the Norwegian Register, if the criteria for level 1 are fulfilled).

Of the 410 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 137 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing:

74 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

4 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

50 publication channels under discussion (level X).

Decision meeting 14.August 2024

On the decision meeting 19.January, we assessed suggestions for new publication channels at level 1. We did also reconsider some publication channels that already had been approved as scientific publication channels. 

Of the 496 publication channels that the Directorate processed and assessed, 49 publication channels were specifically discussed with the Working Committee (AU) for the National Board of Scholarly Publishing:

27 messages of concerns (concerns about the quality of already approved publication channels).

58 follow-up cases (publication channels that we did not decide a level for at the previous decision meeting and that AU is responsible for following up.)

12 special cases (suggestions about publication channels where the Directorate is unsure about the quality of the publication channels).

56 publication channels under discussion (level X).

7 publication channels that resubmitted after they were downgraded to level 0 as a result of the National Board of Scholarly Publication's "cleaning" of the Norwegian Register. 

5 Norwegian publication channels (suggestions about Norwegian publicationc channels, which at the request of the AU are a fixed point at the decision meetings).

Decision meeting 19.January 2024

Before the summer holidays get fully under way, we would like to share some updates on what is happening in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers.

Some updates before the summer

The Norwegian Register is updated with final levels for 2025 and new levels for 2026 in mid-February. 


Levels and changes of levels in the Norwegian Register

We have rebranded and launched new web pages. 

ERIH PLUS is now erih+ 

The Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers (the Norwegian Register) has recently established a Reference Group. The purpose of the Reference Group is to collect feedback on the Norwegian Register’s features. 

The Norwegian Register has a Reference Group!

On 19. June we were visited by three researchers who travelled all the way from South Korea to Norway to learn more about the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers, popularly known as the Norwegian Register. 

Visitors from South Korea

At the meeting of the National Board of Scholarly Publishing 3. December 2021, the National Board decided to do a major review among the already approved journals in the Norwegian Register. We effectuated the results of the review 1. August 2023. 


The National Board of Scholarly Publishing has reviewed the Norwegian Register

The criteria for level 1 have been updated! We have expanded the criteria with more points to highlight what we are considering, in addition to the minimum criteria.

New criteria for level 1

The Directorate receives information about the publishing agreements (consortium agreements) from Sikt (Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research). We cannot update the Norwegian Register before we have received updated information from Sikt. 

When do we update the Norwegian Register with information about the publishing agreements?

The Norwegian Register is now launched with a long-awaited update, with improvements on security and usability. 

New and improved Norwegian Register

The Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers is owned and hosted by the Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Research. The Norwegian Register’s function is to give quality assured information about academic journals, series and publishers. 

Who and what is the Norwegian Register?

From 2025 the Norwegian Government makes changes in the system for funding of Universities and University Colleges. Publication points will no longer be part of the funding of the higher education institutions in Norway. 